Computer virusFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to:
navigation,
searchA computer virus is a
computer program that can copy itself and infect a computer without the permission or knowledge of the user. The term "virus" is also commonly but erroneously used to refer to other types of
malware,
adware and
spyware programs that do not have the reproductive ability. A true virus can only spread from one computer to another (in some form of executable
code) when its host is taken to the target computer; for instance because a user sent it over a network or the Internet, or carried it on a removable medium such as a
floppy disk,
CD,
DVD, or
USB drive. Viruses can increase their chances of spreading to other computers by infecting files on a
network file system or a file system that is accessed by another computer.Viruses are sometimes confused with
computer worms and
Trojan horses, which are technically different. A worm can spread itself to other computers without needing to be transferred as part of a host, and a Trojan horse is a program that appears harmless but has a hidden agenda. Worms and Trojans, like viruses, may cause harm to either a computer system's hosted data, functional performance, or networking throughput, when they are executed. Some viruses and other malware have symptoms noticeable to the computer user, but most are surreptitious. This makes it hard for the average user to notice, find and disable and is why specialist anti-virus programs are now commonplace.Most personal computers are now connected to the Internet and to
local area networks, facilitating the spread of malicious code. Today's viruses may also take advantage of network services such as the
World Wide Web,
e-mail,
Instant Messaging and
file sharing systems to spread, blurring the line between viruses and worms. Furthermore, some sources use an alternative terminology in which a virus is any form of self-replicating
malware.[
edit] HistoryThe
Creeper virus was first detected on
ARPANET, the forerunner of the
Internet in the early 1970s.
[3] Creeper was an experimental
self-replicating program written by
Bob Thomas at
BBN in 1971.
[4] Creeper used the ARPANET to infect DEC
PDP-10 computers running the
TENEX operating system. Creeper gained access via the ARPANET and copied itself to the remote system where the message, "I'm the creeper, catch me if you can!" was displayed. The Reaper program was created to delete Creeper.
[5]A common misconception is that a program called "
Rother J" was the first computer virus to appear "in the wild" — that is, outside the single computer or lab where it was created, but that claim is false. See the
Timeline of notable computer viruses and worms for other earlier viruses. It was, however, the first virus to infect computers "in the home." Written in 1982 by
Richard Skrenta, it attached itself to the
Apple DOS 3.3 operating system and spread via
floppy disk.
[6] This virus was originally a joke, created by a high school student. It was injected in a game on a floppy disk. On its 50th use the
Elk Cloner virus would be activated, infecting the computer and displaying a short poem beginning "Elk Cloner: The program with a personality."The first PC virus in the wild was a boot sector virus dubbed
(c)Brain[7], created in 1986 by the
Farooq Alvi Brothers, operating out of
Lahore, Pakistan. The brothers reportedly created the virus to deter pirated copies of software they had written. However, analysts have claimed that the Ashar virus, a variant of Brain, possibly predated it based on code within the virus.[
original research?Before computer networks became widespread, most viruses spread on
removable media, particularly
floppy disks. In the early days of the
personal computer, many users regularly exchanged information and programs on floppies. Some viruses spread by infecting programs stored on these disks, while others installed themselves into the disk
boot sector, ensuring that they would be run when the user booted the computer from the disk, usually inadvertently. PCs of the era would attempt to boot first from a floppy if one had been left in the drive. Until floppy disks fell out of use, this was the most successful infection strategy and boot sector viruses were the most common in the wild for many years.
[8]Traditional computer viruses emerged in the 1980s, driven by the spread of personal computers and the resultant increase in
BBS,
modem use, and software sharing.
Bulletin board driven software sharing contributed directly to the spread of Trojan horse programs, and viruses were written to infect popularly traded software.
Shareware and
bootleg software were equally common
vectors for viruses on BBS's.[
citation needed] Within the "pirate scene" of hobbyists trading illicit copies of
retail software, traders in a hurry to obtain the latest applications and were easy targets for viruses.[
original research?]Since the mid-1990s,
macro viruses have become common. Most of these viruses are written in the scripting languages for Microsoft programs such as
Word and
Excel and spread throughout
Microsoft Office by infecting documents and spreadsheets. Since Word and Excel were also available for
Mac OS, most could also spread onto
Macintosh computers as well. Although the majority of these viruses did not have the ability to send infected
e-mail, those viruses which did took advantage of the
Microsoft Outlook COM interface.[
citation needed]Macro viruses pose unique problems for detection software[
citation needed]. For example, some versions of Microsoft Word allowed macros to replicate themselves with additional blank lines. The virus behaved identically but would be misidentified as a new virus. Additionally, if two macro viruses simultaneously infect a document, the combination of the two, if also self-replicating, can appear as a "mating" of the two and would likely be detected as a virus unique from the "parents."A virus may also send a
web address link as an
instant message to all the contacts on an infected machine. If the recipient, thinking the link is from a friend (a trusted source) follows the link to the website, the virus hosted at the site may be able to infect this new computer and continue propagating.The newest species of the virus family is the cross-site scripting virus.[
citation needed] The virus emerged from research and was academically demonstrated in 2005.
[10] This virus utilizes
cross-site scripting vulnerabilities to propagate. Since 2005 there have been multiple instances of the cross-site scripting viruses in the wild, most notable sites affected have been
MySpace and
Yahoo.
Infection strategiesIn order to replicate itself, a virus must be permitted to execute code and write to memory. For this reason, many viruses attach themselves to executable files that may be part of legitimate programs. If a user attempts to launch an infected program, the virus' code may be executed alongside. Viruses can be divided into two types, on the basis of their behavior when they are executed. Nonresident viruses immediately search for other hosts that can be infected, infect these targets, and finally transfer control to the
application program they infected. Resident viruses do not search for hosts when they are started. Instead, a resident virus loads itself into memory on execution and transfers control to the host program. The virus stays active in the background and infects new hosts when those files are accessed by other programs or the operating system itself.
Nonresident virusesNonresident viruses can be thought of as consisting of a finder module and a replication module. The finder module is responsible for finding new files to infect. For each new executable file the finder module encounters, it calls the replication module to infect that file.
[11]Resident virusesResident viruses contain a replication module that is similar to the one that is employed by nonresident viruses. However, this module is not called by a finder module. Instead, the virus loads the replication module into memory when it is executed and ensures that this module is executed each time the operating system is called to perform a certain operation. For example, the replication module can be called each time the operating system executes a file. In this case, the virus infects every suitable program that is executed on the computer.Resident viruses are sometimes subdivided into a category of fast infectors and a category of slow infectors. Fast infectors are designed to infect as many files as possible. For instance, a fast infector can infect every potential host file that is accessed. This poses a special problem to anti-virus software, since a virus scanner will access every potential host file on a computer when it performs a system-wide scan. If the virus scanner fails to notice that such a virus is present in memory, the virus can "piggy-back" on the virus scanner and in this way infect all files that are scanned. Fast infectors rely on their fast infection rate to spread. The disadvantage of this method is that infecting many files may make detection more likely, because the virus may slow down a computer or perform many suspicious actions that can be noticed by anti-virus software. Slow infectors, on the other hand, are designed to infect hosts infrequently. For instance, some slow infectors only infect files when they are copied. Slow infectors are designed to avoid detection by limiting their actions: they are less likely to slow down a computer noticeably, and will at most infrequently trigger anti-virus software that detects suspicious behavior by programs. The slow infector approach does not seem very successful, however.
Vectors and hostsViruses have targeted various types of transmission media or hosts. This list is not exhaustive:Binary
executable files (such as
COM files and
EXE files in
MS-DOS,
Portable Executable files in
Microsoft Windows, and
ELF files in
Linux)
Volume Boot Records of
floppy disks and hard disk partitionsThe
master boot record (MBR) of a hard diskGeneral-purpose
script files (such as
batch files in
MS-DOS and
Microsoft Windows,
VBScript files, and
shell script files on
Unix-like platforms).Application-specific script files (such as
Telix-scripts)Documents that can contain
macros (such as
Microsoft Word documents,
Microsoft Excel spreadsheets,
AmiPro documents, and
Microsoft Access database files)
Cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in web applicationsArbitrary computer files. An exploitable
buffer overflow,
format string,
race condition or other exploitable bug in a program which reads the file could be used to trigger the execution of code hidden within it. Most bugs of this type can be made more difficult to exploit in
computer architectures with protection features such as an
execute disable bit and/or address space layout randomization.
PDFs, like
HTML, may link to malicious code.[
citation needed]PDFs can also be infected with malicious code.In operating systems that use file extensions to determine program associations (such as Microsoft Windows), the extensions may be hidden from the user by default. This makes it possible to create a file that is of a different type than it appears to the user. For example, an executable may be created named "picture.png.exe", in which the user sees only "picture.png" and therefore assumes that this file is an image and most likely is safe.
Methods to avoid detectionIn order to avoid detection by users, some viruses employ different kinds of deception. Some old viruses, especially on the MS-DOS platform, make sure that the "last modified" date of a host file stays the same when the file is infected by the virus. This approach does not fool anti-virus software, however, especially those which maintain and date
Cyclic redundancy checks on file changes.Some viruses can infect files without increasing their sizes or damaging the files. They accomplish this by overwriting unused areas of executable files. These are called cavity viruses. For example the
CIH virus, or
Chernobyl Virus, infects
Portable Executable files. Because those files have many empty gaps, the virus, which was 1
KB in length, did not add to the size of the file.Some viruses try to avoid detection by killing the tasks associated with antivirus software before it can detect them.As computers and operating systems grow larger and more complex, old hiding techniques need to be updated or replaced. Defending a computer against viruses may demand that a file system migrate towards detailed and explicit permission for every kind of file access.
Avoiding bait files and other undesirable hostsA virus needs to infect hosts in order to spread further. In some cases, it might be a bad idea to infect a host program. For example, many anti-virus programs perform an integrity check of their own code. Infecting such programs will therefore increase the likelihood that the virus is detected. For this reason, some viruses are programmed not to infect programs that are known to be part of anti-virus software. Another type of host that viruses sometimes avoid is bait files. Bait files (or goat files) are files that are specially created by anti-virus software, or by anti-virus professionals themselves, to be infected by a virus. These files can be created for various reasons, all of which are related to the detection of the virus:Anti-virus professionals can use bait files to take a sample of a virus (i.e. a copy of a program file that is infected by the virus). It is more practical to store and exchange a small, infected bait file, than to exchange a large application program that has been infected by the virus.Anti-virus professionals can use bait files to study the behavior of a virus and evaluate detection methods. This is especially useful when the virus is
polymorphic. In this case, the virus can be made to infect a large number of bait files. The infected files can be used to test whether a virus scanner detects all versions of the virus.Some anti-virus software employs bait files that are accessed regularly. When these files are modified, the anti-virus software warns the user that a virus is probably active on the system.Since bait files are used to detect the virus, or to make detection possible, a virus can benefit from not infecting them. Viruses typically do this by avoiding suspicious programs, such as small program files or programs that contain certain patterns of 'garbage instructions'.A related strategy to make baiting difficult is sparse infection. Sometimes, sparse infectors do not infect a host file that would be a suitable candidate for infection in other circumstances. For example, a virus can decide on a random basis whether to infect a file or not, or a virus can only infect host files on particular days of the week.
StealthSome viruses try to trick anti-virus software by intercepting its requests to the operating system. A virus can hide itself by intercepting the anti-virus software’s request to read the file and passing the request to the virus, instead of the
OS. The virus can then return an uninfected version of the file to the anti-virus software, so that it seems that the file is "clean". Modern anti-virus software employs various techniques to counter stealth mechanisms of viruses. The only completely reliable method to avoid stealth is to boot from a medium that is known to be clean.
Self-modificationMost modern antivirus programs try to find virus-patterns inside ordinary programs by scanning them for so-called virus signatures. A signature is a characteristic byte-pattern that is part of a certain virus or family of viruses. If a virus scanner finds such a pattern in a file, it notifies the user that the file is infected. The user can then delete, or (in some cases) "clean" or "heal" the infected file. Some viruses employ techniques that make detection by means of signatures difficult but probably not impossible. These viruses modify their code on each infection. That is, each infected file contains a different variant of the virus.
Encryption with a variable keyA more advanced method is the use of simple
encryption to encipher the virus. In this case, the virus consists of a small decrypting module and an encrypted copy of the virus code. If the virus is encrypted with a different key for each infected file, the only part of the virus that remains constant is the decrypting module, which would (for example) be appended to the end. In this case, a virus scanner cannot directly detect the virus using signatures, but it can still detect the decrypting module, which still makes indirect detection of the virus possible. Since these would be symmetric keys, stored on the infected host, it is in fact entirely possible to decrypt the final virus, but that probably isn't required, since self-modifying code is such a rarity that it may be reason for virus scanners to at least flag the file as suspicious.An old, but compact, encryption involves
XORing each byte in a virus with a constant, so that the exclusive-or operation had only to be repeated for decryption. It is suspicious code that modifies itself, so the code to do the encryption/decryption may be part of the signature in many virus definitions.
Polymorphic code
Polymorphic code was the first technique that posed a serious threat to virus scanners. Just like regular encrypted viruses, a polymorphic virus infects files with an encrypted copy of itself, which is decoded by a decryption module. In the case of polymorphic viruses, however, this decryption module is also modified on each infection. A well-written polymorphic virus therefore has no parts which remain identical between infections, making it very difficult to detect directly using signatures. Anti-virus software can detect it by decrypting the viruses using an emulator, or by statistical pattern analysis of the encrypted virus body. To enable polymorphic code, the virus has to have a polymorphic engine (also called mutating engine or mutation engine) somewhere in its encrypted body. See
Polymorphic code for technical detail on how such engines operate.Some viruses employ polymorphic code in a way that constrains the mutation rate of the virus significantly. For example, a virus can be programmed to mutate only slightly over time, or it can be programmed to refrain from mutating when it infects a file on a computer that already contains copies of the virus. The advantage of using such slow polymorphic code is that it makes it more difficult for anti-virus professionals to obtain representative samples of the virus, because bait files that are infected in one run will typically contain identical or similar samples of the virus. This will make it more likely that the detection by the virus scanner will be unreliable, and that some instances of the virus may be able to avoid detection.
Metamorphic codeTo avoid being detected by emulation, some viruses rewrite themselves completely each time they are to infect new executables. Viruses that use this technique are said to be
metamorphic. To enable
metamorphism, a metamorphic engine is needed. A metamorphic virus is usually very large and complex. For example,
W32/Simile consisted of over 14000 lines of
Assembly language code, 90% of which is part of the metamorphic engine.
[13][14]Vulnerability and countermeasures
The vulnerability of operating systems to virusesJust as
genetic diversity in a population decreases the chance of a single disease wiping out a population, the diversity of software systems on a network similarly limits the destructive potential of viruses.This became a particular concern in the 1990s, when
Microsoft gained market dominance in desktop operating systems and
office suites. The users of Microsoft software (especially networking software such as
Microsoft Outlook and
Internet Explorer) are especially vulnerable to the spread of viruses. Microsoft software is targeted by virus writers due to their desktop dominance, and is often criticized for including many errors and holes for virus writers to exploit. Integrated and non-integrated Microsoft applications (such as
Microsoft Office) and applications with scripting languages with access to the file system (for example
Visual Basic Script (VBS), and applications with networking features) are also particularly vulnerable.Although Windows is by far the most popular operating system for virus writers, some viruses also exist on other platforms. Any operating system that allows third-party programs to run can theoretically run viruses. Some operating systems are less secure than others. Unix-based OS's (and NTFS-aware applications on Windows NT based platforms) only allow their users to run executables within their own protected memory space.An Internet based research revealed that there were cases when people willingly pressed a particular button to download a virus. Security analyst Didier Stevens ran a half year advertising campaign on
Google AdWords which said "Is your PC virus-free? Get it infected here!". The result was 409 clicks.
[15][16]As of 2006
[update], there are relatively few security exploits
[17] targeting
Mac OS X (with a Unix-based file system and
kernel). The number of viruses for the older Apple operating systems, known as Mac OS Classic, varies greatly from source to source, with Apple stating that there are only four known viruses, and
independent sources stating there are as many as 63 viruses. Virus vulnerability between Macs and Windows is a chief selling point, one that
Apple uses in their
Get a Mac advertising.
[18]Windows and Unix have similar scripting abilities, but while Unix natively blocks normal users from having access to make changes to the operating system environment, older copies of Windows such as Windows 95 and 98 do not. In 1997, when a virus for Linux was released – known as "
Bliss" – leading antivirus vendors issued warnings that
Unix-like systems could fall prey to viruses just like Windows.
[19] The Bliss virus may be considered characteristic of viruses – as opposed to worms – on Unix systems. Bliss requires that the user run it explicitly (so it is a trojan), and it can only infect programs that the user has the access to modify. Unlike Windows users, most Unix users do not
log in as an administrator user except to install or configure software; as a result, even if a user ran the virus, it could not harm their operating system. The Bliss virus never became widespread, and remains chiefly a research curiosity. Its creator later posted the source code to Usenet, allowing researchers to see how it worked.
[20]The role of software developmentBecause software is often designed with security features to prevent unauthorized use of system resources, many viruses must exploit
software bugs in a system or application to spread.
Software development strategies that produce large numbers of bugs will generally also produce potential exploits.
Anti-virus software and other preventive measuresMany users install
anti-virus software that can detect and eliminate known viruses after the computer
downloads or runs the executable. There are two common methods that an
anti-virus software application uses to detect viruses. The first, and by far the most common method of virus detection is using a list of
virus signature definitions. This works by examining the content of the computer's memory (its
RAM, and
boot sectors) and the files stored on fixed or removable drives (hard drives, floppy drives), and comparing those files against a
database of known virus "signatures". The disadvantage of this detection method is that users are only protected from viruses that pre-date their last virus definition update. The second method is to use a
heuristic algorithm to find viruses based on common behaviors. This method has the ability to detect viruses that anti-virus security firms have yet to create a signature for.Some anti-virus programs are able to scan opened files in addition to sent and received e-mails 'on the fly' in a similar manner. This practice is known as "on-access scanning." Anti-virus software does not change the underlying capability of host software to transmit viruses. Users must update their software regularly to
patch security holes. Anti-virus software also needs to be regularly updated in order to prevent the latest threats.One may also minimise the damage done by viruses by making regular
backups of data (and the Operating Systems) on different media, that are either kept unconnected to the system (most of the time), read-only or not accessible for other reasons, such as using different
file systems. This way, if data is lost through a virus, one can start again using the backup (which should preferably be recent).If a backup session on
optical media like
CD and
DVD is closed, it becomes read-only and can no longer be affected by a virus (so long as a virus or infected file was not copied onto the CD/DVD). Likewise, an operating system on a
bootable can be used to start the computer if the installed operating systems become unusable. Backups on removable media must be carefully inspected before restoration. The Gammima virus, for example, propagates via removable
flash drives.Another method is to use different operating systems on different file systems. A virus is not likely to affect both. Data backups can also be put on different file systems. For example, Linux requires specific software to write to
NTFS partitions, so if one does not install such software and uses a separate installation of MS Windows to make the backups on an NTFS partition, the backup should remain safe from any Linux viruses (unless they are written to specifically provide this capability). Likewise, MS Windows can not read file systems like
ext3, so if one normally uses MS Windows, the backups can be made on an ext3 partition using a Linux installation.Recovery methodsOnce a computer has been compromised by a virus, it is usually unsafe to continue using the same computer without completely reinstalling the operating system. However, there are a number of recovery options that exist after a computer has a virus. These actions depend on severity of the type of virus.
Virus removalOne possibility on
Windows Me,
Windows XP and
Windows Vista is a tool known as
System Restore, which restores the registry and critical system files to a previous checkpoint. Often a virus will cause a system to hang, and a subsequent hard reboot will render a system restore point from the same day corrupt. Restore points from previous days should work provided the virus is not designed to corrupt the restore files or also exists in previous restore points.
[23] Some viruses, however, disable system restore and other important tools such as Task Manager and Command Prompt. An example of a virus that does this is CiaDoor.Administrators have the option to disable such tools from limited users for various reasons (for example, to reduce potential damage from and the spread of viruses). The virus modifies the registry to do the same, except, when the Administrator is controlling the computer, it blocks all users from accessing the tools. When an infected tool activates it gives the message "Task Manager has been disabled by your administrator.", even if the user trying to open the program is the administrator.[
citation needed]Users running a Microsoft operating system can access Microsoft's website to run a free scan, provided they have their 20-digit registration number.
Operating system reinstallationReinstalling the operating system is another approach to virus removal. It involves simply reformatting the OS partition and installing the OS from its original media, or
imaging the partition with a clean backup image (Taken with
Ghost or
Acronis for example).This method has the benefits of being simple to do, being faster than running multiple antivirus scans, and is guaranteed to remove any malware. Downsides include having to reinstall all other software, reconfiguring, restoring user preferences. User data can be backed up by booting off of a
Live CD or putting the hard drive into another computer and booting from the other computer's operating system (though care must be taken not to transfer the virus to the new computer).
This Blog own by MICHELLE DASO BSCS-2B
